Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VPU vs VXF: how they differ

VPU and VXF hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VXF returned more over the year.

Vanguard Utilities Index Fund and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VPU and VXF hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VPU and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVPUVXF
Talen Energy Corp0.99%0.20%
Essential Utilities Inc0.69%0.13%
OGE Energy Corp0.64%0.12%
IDACORP Inc0.50%0.10%
UGI Corp0.50%0.09%
National Fuel Gas Co0.46%0.09%
Oklo Inc0.39%0.09%
Ormat Technologies Inc0.44%0.08%
Portland General Electric Co0.37%0.07%
Black Hills Corp0.36%0.07%
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc0.35%0.07%
New Jersey Resources Corp0.37%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VPUOnly in VXF
NextEra Energy Inc 11.84%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
Southern Co/The 6.70%Snowflake Inc 1.03%
Duke Energy Corp 6.31%Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%
Constellation Energy Corp 5.86%Cloudflare Inc 0.92%
American Electric Power Co Inc 4.47%Astera Labs Inc 0.76%
Sempra 3.85%Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%
Dominion Energy Inc 3.78%Cheniere Energy Inc 0.59%
Vistra Corp 3.59%Ferguson Enterprises Inc 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VPU and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isUtilitiesExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+2.1%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.4 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50090.1%0.0%
Holdings663365

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VPU or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPU returned +2.1% and VXF returned +14.1%, so VXF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VPU or VXF?
VPU charges 0.09% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VPU and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of VPU and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VPU against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VPU against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VPU-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources