Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VPU vs VT: how they differ

VPU and VT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Utilities Index Fund and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VPU and VT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VPU and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVPUVT
NextEra Energy Inc11.84%0.18%
Southern Co/The6.70%0.10%
Duke Energy Corp6.31%0.09%
Constellation Energy Corp5.86%0.09%
American Electric Power Co Inc4.47%0.07%
Dominion Energy Inc3.78%0.05%
Vistra Corp3.59%0.05%
Entergy Corp3.22%0.05%
Xcel Energy Inc3.11%0.04%
Exelon Corp3.05%0.04%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc2.60%0.04%
Consolidated Edison Inc2.52%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VPUOnly in VT
NextEra Energy Partners LP 0.07%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Middlesex Water Co 0.06%Apple Inc 3.53%
Unitil Corp 0.06%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Hallador Energy Co 0.04%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Consolidated Water Co Ltd 0.03%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
York Water Co/The 0.03%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Artesian Resources Corp 0.02%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Genie Energy Ltd 0.01%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VPU and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isUtilitiesTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+2.1%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.4 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50090.1%55.2%
Holdings6610042

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VPU or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPU returned +2.1% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VPU or VT?
VPU charges 0.09% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VPU and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of VPU and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VPU against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VPU against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VPU-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources