Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VPL vs VYMI: how they differ

VPL and VYMI hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VPL and VYMI hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VPL and VYMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVPLVYMI
Commonwealth Bank of Australia1.80%1.15%
Toyota Motor Corp1.74%1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc1.69%1.08%
BHP Group Ltd1.66%1.06%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc1.10%0.71%
Mizuho Financial Group Inc0.88%0.57%
Westpac Banking Corp0.82%0.52%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd0.79%0.51%
National Australia Bank Ltd0.76%0.48%
Tokio Marine Holdings Inc0.70%0.46%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd0.68%0.45%
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd0.54%0.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VPLOnly in VYMI
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.73%
SK hynix Inc 4.12%Novartis AG 1.56%
Hitachi Ltd 1.18%Nestle SA 1.44%
Advantest Corp 1.16%Shell PLC 1.43%
SoftBank Group Corp 1.14%Royal Bank of Canada 1.38%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.11%Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.99%
Sony Group Corp 1.03%Banco Santander SA 0.98%
AIA Group Ltd 0.98%Allianz SE 0.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

VPL and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VPL
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isPacific StockInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+36.9%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+19.4 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%0.1%
Holdings23351582

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VPL or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPL returned +36.9% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VPL or VYMI?
VPL charges 0.07% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VPL and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VPL and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VPL against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VPL against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VPL-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources