Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VPL: how they differ

ACWI and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VPL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVPL
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust0.01%0.09%
Kirin Holdings Company, Limited0.01%0.11%
Alteogen Inc0.01%0.09%
CapitaLand Ascendas REIT0.01%0.07%
Pro Medicus Ltd0.01%0.04%
SITC International Holdings Co Ltd0.01%0.05%
TOPPAN Holdings Inc.0.01%0.06%
HD Hyundai Marine Solution Co Ltd0.00%0.03%
Zijin Gold International Co Ltd0.00%0.04%
Keppel REIT0.00%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VPL
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%
APPLE INC. 4.02%SK hynix Inc 4.12%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Toyota Motor Corp 1.74%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%BHP Group Ltd 1.66%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Hitachi Ltd 1.18%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Advantest Corp 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VPL
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIPacific Stock
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+19.4 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.1%
Holdings23072335

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VPL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VPL?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources