Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VPL vs VTV: how they differ
VPL and VTV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund and Vanguard Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VPL and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in VPL | Only in VTV |
|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06% | Micron Technology Inc 4.89% |
| SK hynix Inc 4.12% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07% |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96% |
| Toyota Motor Corp 1.74% | Johnson & Johnson 2.30% |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13% |
| BHP Group Ltd 1.66% | Walmart Inc 1.87% |
| Hitachi Ltd 1.18% | Caterpillar Inc 1.84% |
| Advantest Corp 1.16% | AbbVie Inc 1.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund | VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | Pacific Stock | US value |
| Total return, 1 year | +36.9% | +22.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +19.4 pts | +5.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 98.6% |
| Holdings | 2335 | 308 |
VPL in plain words
VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.
VTV in plain words
VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VPL or VTV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPL returned +36.9% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VPL or VTV?
- VPL charges 0.07% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VPL and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VPL and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VPL against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VPL-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources