Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOOG vs XLF: how they differ

VOOG and XLF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOOG and XLF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOOG and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOGXLF
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.42%12.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.43%11.57%
Visa Inc0.84%7.51%
Mastercard Inc0.75%5.47%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The0.53%3.94%
Morgan Stanley0.42%3.31%
American Express Co0.32%2.38%
Robinhood Markets Inc0.21%1.05%
Progressive Corp/The0.17%1.68%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/The0.17%1.31%
S&P Global Inc0.16%1.63%
CME Group Inc0.15%1.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOGOnly in XLF
NVIDIA Corp 14.29%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Microsoft Corp 9.31%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Apple Inc 6.38%Citigroup Inc 3.15%
Alphabet Inc 6.17%Charles Schwab Corp/The 1.99%
Broadcom Inc 5.90%Blackrock Inc 1.83%
Alphabet Inc 4.90%Capital One Financial Corp 1.65%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90%Chubb Ltd 1.62%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.85%PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 1.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOOG and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isS&P 500 GrowthFinancials
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.3 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings14676

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOOG or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOOG returned +17.8% and XLF returned +7.6%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOOG or XLF?
VOOG charges 0.05% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOOG and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOOG and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOOG against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOOG against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOOG-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources