Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs XRT: how they differ

VONG and XRT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VONG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGXRT
Amazon.com Inc5.07%1.35%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.28%1.29%
TJX Cos Inc/The0.26%1.22%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc0.20%1.38%
Walmart Inc0.15%1.27%
Carvana Co0.15%1.32%
Coupang Inc0.07%1.55%
Burlington Stores Inc0.06%1.31%
Tractor Supply Co0.05%1.39%
Ross Stores Inc0.04%1.24%
Murphy USA Inc0.03%1.19%
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc0.02%1.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in XRT
NVIDIA Corp 13.09%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Apple Inc 11.97%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Microsoft Corp 8.98%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
Broadcom Inc 5.78%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Alphabet Inc 3.91%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Tesla Inc 3.48%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Alphabet Inc 3.15%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+7.2%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%22.5%
Holdings38775

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XRT returned −3.0%, so VONG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or XRT?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources