Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VONG vs XLY: how they differ
VONG and XLY hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VONG returned more over the year.
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XLY hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VONG | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.07% | 22.24% |
| Tesla Inc | 3.48% | 19.66% |
| Home Depot Inc/The | 0.73% | 5.83% |
| Booking Holdings Inc | 0.39% | 3.44% |
| TJX Cos Inc/The | 0.26% | 3.93% |
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | 0.23% | 1.87% |
| O'Reilly Automotive Inc | 0.20% | 1.90% |
| Marriott International Inc/MD | 0.19% | 2.02% |
| DoorDash Inc | 0.18% | 1.74% |
| Airbnb Inc | 0.17% | 1.49% |
| Carvana Co | 0.15% | 1.17% |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 0.13% | 1.09% |
| Only in VONG | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.09% | Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08% |
| Apple Inc 11.97% | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97% |
| Microsoft Corp 8.98% | General Motors Co 1.73% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.78% | Ford Motor Co 1.35% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.91% | eBay Inc 1.24% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.20% | NIKE Inc 1.23% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.15% | DR Horton Inc 1.07% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% | Garmin Ltd 0.97% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 Growth | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 387 | 47 |
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XLY returned −4.1%, so VONG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VONG or XLY?
- VONG charges 0.07% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VONG and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources