Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs XLF: how they differ

VONG and XLF hold 4% of their weight in the same names.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and XLF hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGXLF
Visa Inc1.57%7.51%
Mastercard Inc1.20%5.47%
Blackstone Inc0.26%1.15%
Moody's Corp0.21%0.90%
American Express Co0.17%2.38%
Apollo Global Management Inc0.11%0.72%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.11%0.54%
Citigroup Inc0.11%3.15%
Bank of America Corp0.08%4.91%
Corpay Inc0.07%0.29%
Ares Management Corp0.07%0.31%
MSCI Inc0.07%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in XLF
NVIDIA Corp 13.09%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Apple Inc 11.97%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Microsoft Corp 8.98%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Broadcom Inc 5.78%Morgan Stanley 3.31%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%Blackrock Inc 1.83%
Alphabet Inc 3.91%Capital One Financial Corp 1.65%
Tesla Inc 3.48%S&P Global Inc 1.63%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%Chubb Ltd 1.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthFinancials
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%100.0%
Holdings38776

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or XLF?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources