Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VONG vs VYM: how they differ

VONG and VYM hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VONG and VYM hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VONG and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVONGVYM
Broadcom Inc5.78%8.07%
AbbVie Inc1.16%1.57%
Oracle Corp1.15%1.14%
Home Depot Inc/The0.73%1.37%
Coca-Cola Co/The0.45%1.28%
Amgen Inc0.40%0.72%
Texas Instruments Inc0.34%1.07%
Blackstone Inc0.26%0.39%
Automatic Data Processing Inc0.25%0.36%
Waste Management Inc0.24%0.36%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd0.22%0.28%
QUALCOMM Inc0.18%0.80%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VONGOnly in VYM
NVIDIA Corp 13.09%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Apple Inc 11.97%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Microsoft Corp 8.98%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Alphabet Inc 3.91%Chevron Corp 1.51%
Tesla Inc 3.48%Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.41%
Alphabet Inc 3.15%Merck & Co Inc 1.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VONG and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 GrowthUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50095.6%92.2%
Holdings387608

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VONG or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VONG returned +7.2% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VONG or VYM?
VONG charges 0.07% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VONG and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VONG and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VONG against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VONG against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VONG-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources