Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOE vs XLF: how they differ

VOE and XLF hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOE and XLF hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOE and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOEXLF
Allstate Corp/The1.06%0.81%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co1.02%0.78%
Aflac Inc0.93%0.71%
Fifth Third Bancorp0.89%0.67%
State Street Corp0.77%0.62%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.61%0.93%
MetLife Inc0.80%0.60%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.72%0.54%
Truist Financial Corp0.54%0.82%
American International Group Inc0.69%0.52%
Prudential Financial Inc0.65%0.49%
Hartford Financial Services Group Inc/Th0.63%0.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOEOnly in XLF
Cummins Inc 1.71%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Valero Energy Corp 1.34%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%Visa Inc 7.51%
CRH PLC 1.24%Mastercard Inc 5.47%
United Rentals Inc 1.23%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
General Motors Co 1.21%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
SLB Ltd 1.21%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%Morgan Stanley 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VOE and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-Cap ValueFinancials
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.7 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.6%100.0%
Holdings17076

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOE or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and XLF returned +7.6%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOE or XLF?
VOE charges 0.05% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOE and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOE against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources