Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOE vs VYM: how they differ

VOE and VYM hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOE and VYM hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOE and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOEVYM
Newmont Corp0.86%0.51%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.79%0.39%
Cummins Inc1.71%0.39%
Johnson Controls International plc0.77%0.37%
FedEx Corp0.58%0.36%
SLB Ltd1.21%0.36%
CRH PLC1.24%0.33%
Valero Energy Corp1.34%0.32%
Marathon Petroleum Corp1.29%0.31%
American Electric Power Co Inc0.65%0.31%
Phillips 661.18%0.30%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.61%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOEOnly in VYM
United Rentals Inc 1.23%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
General Motors Co 1.21%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc 1.10%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Digital Realty Trust Inc 1.09%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Keysight Technologies Inc 1.04%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co 1.02%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Delta Air Lines Inc 1.01%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VOE and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isMid-Cap ValueUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.7 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50096.6%92.2%
Holdings170608

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOE or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOE or VYM?
VOE charges 0.05% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOE and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOE against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources