Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VO vs XLF: how they differ

VO and XLF hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VO and XLF hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VO and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOXLF
Robinhood Markets Inc0.77%1.05%
Allstate Corp/The0.59%0.81%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co0.57%0.78%
Aflac Inc0.52%0.71%
Fifth Third Bancorp0.50%0.67%
MetLife Inc0.45%0.60%
State Street Corp0.43%0.62%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.40%0.54%
Block Inc0.40%0.54%
Nasdaq Inc0.39%0.47%
American International Group Inc0.38%0.52%
MSCI Inc0.38%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOnly in XLF
Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Western Digital Corp 1.07%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%Visa Inc 7.51%
Quanta Services Inc 1.05%Mastercard Inc 5.47%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Cummins Inc 0.95%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
Datadog Inc 0.84%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%Morgan Stanley 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VO and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-CapFinancials
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.5 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.4%100.0%
Holdings28276

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VO or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.0% and XLF returned +7.6%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VO or XLF?
VO charges 0.03% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VO and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of VO and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VO against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VO against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VO-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources