Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VO vs VYM: how they differ

VO and VYM hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VO and VYM hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VO and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOVYM
Newmont Corp0.48%0.51%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.44%0.39%
Cummins Inc0.95%0.39%
Johnson Controls International plc0.43%0.37%
SLB Ltd0.67%0.36%
CRH PLC0.69%0.33%
FedEx Corp0.33%0.36%
Valero Energy Corp0.75%0.32%
Marathon Petroleum Corp0.72%0.31%
American Electric Power Co Inc0.36%0.31%
Phillips 660.66%0.30%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.34%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOnly in VYM
Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Western Digital Corp 1.07%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Quanta Services Inc 1.05%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Datadog Inc 0.84%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Constellation Energy Corp 0.78%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VO and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isMid-CapUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.5 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50091.4%92.2%
Holdings282608

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VO or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.0% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VO or VYM?
VO charges 0.03% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VO and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of VO and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VO against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VO against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VO-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources