Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VIG vs VXF: how they differ

VIG and VXF hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VXF returned more over the year.

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VIG and VXF hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VIG and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVIGVXF
Sunbelt Rentals Holdings Inc0.14%0.36%
BWX Technologies Inc0.09%0.21%
RB Global Inc0.09%0.26%
Reliance Inc0.09%0.22%
Royal Gold Inc0.09%0.19%
ITT Inc0.08%0.21%
HEICO Corp0.07%0.22%
Watsco Inc0.07%0.17%
DT Midstream Inc0.07%0.18%
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc0.07%0.18%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.07%0.17%
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc0.07%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VIGOnly in VXF
Broadcom Inc 5.21%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
Apple Inc 4.10%Snowflake Inc 1.03%
Microsoft Corp 3.99%Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%Cloudflare Inc 0.92%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%Astera Labs Inc 0.76%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%
Walmart Inc 2.62%Cheniere Energy Inc 0.59%
Johnson & Johnson 2.51%Ferguson Enterprises Inc 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VIG and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDividend growthExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.7%0.0%
Holdings3323365

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VIG or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VIG returned +12.4% and VXF returned +14.1%, so VXF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VIG or VXF?
VIG charges 0.04% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VIG and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VIG and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VIG against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VIG against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VIG-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources