Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VIG vs VOOG: how they differ

VIG and VOOG hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VIG and VOOG hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VIG and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVIGVOOG
Broadcom Inc5.21%5.90%
Apple Inc4.10%6.38%
Microsoft Corp3.99%9.31%
Eli Lilly & Co3.36%2.44%
JPMorgan Chase & Co3.61%1.43%
Caterpillar Inc1.88%1.14%
Lam Research Corp1.46%1.11%
Johnson & Johnson2.51%0.89%
Visa Inc2.34%0.84%
Mastercard Inc1.86%0.75%
Cisco Systems Inc1.64%0.70%
KLA Corp1.04%0.70%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VIGOnly in VOOG
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%NVIDIA Corp 14.29%
Walmart Inc 2.62%Alphabet Inc 6.17%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.04%Alphabet Inc 4.90%
Bank of America Corp 1.58%Amazon.com Inc 3.90%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.55%Meta Platforms Inc 3.85%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.52%Micron Technology Inc 3.04%
Home Depot Inc/The 1.48%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%
Merck & Co Inc 1.23%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VIG and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDividend growthS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.7%100.0%
Holdings332146

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VIG or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VIG returned +12.4% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VIG or VOOG?
VIG charges 0.04% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VIG and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VIG and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VIG against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VIG against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VIG-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources