Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VIG vs VONG: how they differ

VIG and VONG hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and VIG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VIG and VONG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VIG and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVIGVONG
Broadcom Inc5.21%5.78%
Apple Inc4.10%11.97%
Microsoft Corp3.99%8.98%
Eli Lilly & Co3.36%2.67%
Visa Inc2.34%1.57%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.04%1.28%
Lam Research Corp1.46%1.21%
Mastercard Inc1.86%1.20%
AbbVie Inc1.69%1.16%
Oracle Corp1.24%1.15%
KLA Corp1.04%0.76%
Home Depot Inc/The1.48%0.73%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VIGOnly in VONG
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Johnson & Johnson 2.51%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.64%Tesla Inc 3.48%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.55%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.52%Alphabet Inc 3.15%
Merck & Co Inc 1.23%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47%
Linde PLC 1.06%Netflix Inc 1.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VIG and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDividend growthRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50095.7%95.6%
Holdings332387

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VIG or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VIG returned +12.4% and VONG returned +7.2%, so VIG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VIG or VONG?
VIG charges 0.04% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VIG and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VIG and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VIG against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VIG against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VIG-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources