Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VIG vs VLUE: how they differ

VIG and VLUE hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VIG and VLUE hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VIG and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVIGVLUE
Cisco Systems Inc1.64%4.97%
Bank of America Corp1.58%1.88%
Merck & Co Inc1.23%1.57%
QUALCOMM Inc0.87%1.80%
Accenture PLC0.50%0.65%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The0.39%0.46%
CSX Corp0.38%0.64%
Elevance Health Inc0.37%0.63%
TE Connectivity PLC0.28%0.93%
L3Harris Technologies Inc0.27%0.59%
Nucor Corp0.23%0.38%
MetLife Inc0.20%0.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VIGOnly in VLUE
Broadcom Inc 5.21%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
Apple Inc 4.10%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 3.99%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Walmart Inc 2.62%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%
Johnson & Johnson 2.51%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

VIG and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isDividend growthMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50095.7%96.9%
Holdings332148

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VIG or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VIG returned +12.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VIG or VLUE?
VIG charges 0.04% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VIG and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of VIG and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VIG against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VIG against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VIG-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources