Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VHT vs VTI: how they differ

VHT and VTI hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Health Care Index Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VHT and VTI hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VHT and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVHTVTI
Eli Lilly & Co14.07%1.41%
Johnson & Johnson8.48%0.85%
AbbVie Inc6.10%0.62%
UnitedHealth Group Inc5.46%0.52%
Merck & Co Inc4.67%0.44%
Amgen Inc2.87%0.27%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc2.93%0.26%
Abbott Laboratories2.36%0.22%
Gilead Sciences Inc2.64%0.22%
Intuitive Surgical Inc2.39%0.20%
Pfizer Inc2.36%0.19%
CVS Health Corp1.83%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VHTOnly in VTI
Masimo Corp 0.13%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
LivaNova PLC 0.06%Apple Inc 5.88%
Definium Therapeutics Inc 0.03%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.03%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Newamsterdam Pharma Co NV 0.02%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
Biohaven Ltd 0.02%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Establishment Labs Holdings Inc 0.02%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
UroGen Pharma Ltd 0.02%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VHT and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isHealth CareUS total market
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50085.6%88.3%
Holdings4013531

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VHT or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VHT returned +21.6% and VTI returned +17.2%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VHT or VTI?
VHT charges 0.09% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VHT and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of VHT and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VHT against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VHT against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VHT-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources