Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VGLT vs XOP: how they differ
VGLT is a bond index fund and XOP a commodity fund, and over the year XOP returned more, +52.4% against −5.4%.
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.
| VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund | XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Long-term Treasury | SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Total return, 1 year | −5.4% | +52.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −22.9 pts | +34.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 51 |
VGLT in plain words
VGLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −5.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 39.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
XOP in plain words
XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VGLT or XOP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGLT returned −5.4% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGLT against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGLT-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources