Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VEA vs VXUS: how they differ

VEA and VXUS hold 71% of their weight in the same names, and VEA returned more over the year.

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VEA and VXUS hold 71% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VEA and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVEAVXUS
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.56%1.67%
ASML Holding NV2.37%1.32%
SK hynix Inc1.40%1.14%
HSBC Holdings PLC1.01%0.74%
AstraZeneca PLC0.87%0.67%
Novartis AG0.91%0.67%
Nestle SA0.82%0.61%
Shell PLC0.68%0.61%
Royal Bank of Canada0.90%0.59%
Siemens AG0.73%0.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.59%0.49%
Toyota Motor Corp0.56%0.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VEAOnly in VXUS
Ferrovial NV 0.10%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97%
Thomson Reuters Corp 0.03%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89%
Wise Group PLC 0.03%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69%
EDP Renewables SA 0.01%Delta Electronics Inc 0.32%
Seabridge Gold Inc 0.01%MediaTek Inc 0.29%
Taseko Mines Ltd 0.01%Reliance Industries Ltd 0.24%
SBI Shinsei Bank Ltd 0.01%HDFC Bank Ltd 0.22%
Lakefront Biotherapeutics NV 0.01%Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VEA and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VEA
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDeveloped markets ex USTotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings38708775

VEA in plain words

VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VEA or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VEA returned +24.5% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VEA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VEA or VXUS?
VEA charges 0.03% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VEA and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VEA and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 71% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VEA against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VEA against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VEA-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources