Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VDC vs VYM: how they differ

VDC and VYM hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VDC and VYM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VDC and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVDCVYM
Procter & Gamble Co/The9.27%1.45%
Coca-Cola Co/The8.72%1.28%
Philip Morris International Inc4.66%1.08%
PepsiCo Inc4.30%0.91%
Altria Group Inc3.91%0.51%
Mondelez International Inc2.69%0.33%
Colgate-Palmolive Co2.37%0.29%
Target Corp2.03%0.25%
Kroger Co/The1.39%0.17%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc1.41%0.16%
Sysco Corp1.30%0.15%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co1.41%0.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VDCOnly in VYM
Walmart Inc 14.76%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Monster Beverage Corp 2.24%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Casey's General Stores Inc 1.11%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Church & Dwight Co Inc 0.89%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Dollar Tree Inc 0.87%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
US Foods Holding Corp 0.74%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Performance Food Group Co 0.66%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VDC and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isConsumer StaplesUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.9 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50086.6%92.2%
Holdings103608

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDC or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +4.6% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VDC or VYM?
VDC charges 0.09% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDC and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VDC and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VDC against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDC against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDC-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources