Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBR vs VYM: how they differ

VBR and VYM hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBR and VYM hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBR and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBRVYM
EQT Corp0.18%0.15%
NRG Energy Inc0.66%0.13%
Atmos Energy Corp0.62%0.13%
Tapestry Inc0.64%0.12%
Dow Inc0.21%0.12%
Hubbell Inc0.15%0.11%
Omnicom Group Inc0.45%0.10%
Albemarle Corp0.17%0.10%
Expand Energy Corp0.47%0.10%
NiSource Inc0.24%0.10%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.45%0.09%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.59%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBROnly in VYM
Jabil Inc 0.87%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Moderna Inc 0.54%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
F5 Inc 0.50%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
TD SYNNEX Corp 0.41%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Essex Property Trust Inc 0.40%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
DuPont de Nemours Inc 0.40%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VBR and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-Cap ValueUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.2 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50030.5%92.2%
Holdings840608

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBR or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBR returned +16.3% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBR or VYM?
VBR charges 0.05% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBR and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 30% of VBR and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBR against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBR against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBR-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources