Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBR vs VIG: how they differ

VBR and VIG hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBR and VIG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBR and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBRVIG
Atmos Energy Corp0.62%0.14%
Steel Dynamics Inc0.34%0.14%
Hubbell Inc0.15%0.12%
Albemarle Corp0.17%0.10%
NiSource Inc0.24%0.10%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.45%0.10%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.59%0.10%
Alliant Energy Corp0.21%0.09%
Reliance Inc0.41%0.09%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.47%0.09%
ITT Inc0.19%0.08%
Tractor Supply Co0.18%0.08%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBROnly in VIG
Jabil Inc 0.87%Broadcom Inc 5.21%
NRG Energy Inc 0.66%Apple Inc 4.10%
Tapestry Inc 0.64%Microsoft Corp 3.99%
Moderna Inc 0.54%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%
Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
F5 Inc 0.50%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%Walmart Inc 2.62%
Expand Energy Corp 0.47%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VBR and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-Cap ValueDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.2 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50030.5%95.7%
Holdings840332

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBR or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBR returned +16.3% and VIG returned +12.4%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBR or VIG?
VBR charges 0.05% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBR and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 30% of VBR and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBR against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBR against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBR-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources