Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBK vs XOVR: how they differ

VBK and XOVR hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBK and XOVR hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBK and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBKXOVR
Astera Labs Inc1.05%7.75%
Natera Inc1.04%3.70%
Affirm Holdings Inc0.61%2.64%
Roku Inc0.51%2.16%
Toast Inc0.38%1.71%
Exelixis Inc0.37%1.89%
Medpace Holdings Inc0.34%1.67%
DraftKings Inc0.34%1.81%
Globus Medical Inc0.25%1.35%
Tempus AI Inc0.19%2.06%
Pegasystems Inc0.08%1.56%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBKOnly in XOVR
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%Nvidia Corp 9.48%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%Alphabet Inc 6.53%
Twilio Inc 0.88%Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%Applovin Corp 3.95%
Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56%
Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%
FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%Reddit Inc 2.78%
nVent Electric PLC 0.77%Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VBK and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardERShares
What it isSmall-Cap GrowthPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+13.8%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50010.2%43.4%
Holdings54532

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBK or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBK returned +13.8% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBK or XOVR?
VBK charges 0.05% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBK and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of VBK and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBK against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBK against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBK-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources