Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBK vs XHB: how they differ

VBK and XHB hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBK and XHB hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBK and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBKXHB
Lennox International Inc0.51%3.37%
Modine Manufacturing Co0.40%3.07%
Tempur Sealy International Inc0.38%3.40%
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc0.34%3.60%
TopBuild Corp0.28%2.67%
AAON Inc0.25%3.11%
Installed Building Products Inc0.15%3.49%
Champion Homes Inc0.07%3.34%
Cavco Industries Inc0.07%3.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBKOnly in XHB
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%Owens Corning 4.10%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%KB Home 3.56%
Astera Labs Inc 1.05%Builders FirstSource Inc 3.56%
Natera Inc 1.04%Meritage Homes Corp 3.53%
Twilio Inc 0.88%Toll Brothers Inc 3.52%
Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%PulteGroup Inc 3.44%
Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%Masco Corp 3.41%
Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%Williams-Sonoma Inc 3.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VBK and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-Cap GrowthSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+13.8%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50010.2%45.7%
Holdings54535

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBK or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBK returned +13.8% and XHB returned −16.6%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBK or XHB?
VBK charges 0.05% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBK and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of VBK and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBK against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBK against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBK-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources