Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBK vs VT: how they differ

VBK and VT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBK and VT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBK and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBKVT
EMCOR Group Inc0.52%0.04%
EQT Corp0.23%0.03%
Flex Ltd0.42%0.03%
TechnipFMC PLC0.74%0.03%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.83%0.03%
Hubbell Inc0.20%0.03%
Insmed Inc0.33%0.03%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd1.27%0.03%
Curtiss-Wright Corp0.79%0.03%
Natera Inc1.04%0.03%
Astera Labs Inc1.05%0.02%
FTAI Aviation Ltd0.78%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBKOnly in VT
Argan Inc 0.30%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Powell Industries Inc 0.23%Apple Inc 3.53%
Forgent Power Solutions Inc 0.20%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Erie Indemnity Co 0.17%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.17%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
Applied Optoelectronics Inc 0.16%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Legence Corp 0.14%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Veeco Instruments Inc 0.12%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VBK and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-Cap GrowthTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50010.2%55.2%
Holdings54510042

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBK or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBK returned +13.8% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBK or VT?
VBK charges 0.05% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBK and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of VBK and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBK against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBK against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBK-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources