Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBK vs VO: how they differ

VBK and VO hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBK and VO hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBK and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBKVO
Astera Labs Inc1.05%0.36%
Flex Ltd0.42%0.29%
EQT Corp0.23%0.16%
Hubbell Inc0.20%0.13%
Texas Pacific Land Corp0.36%0.12%
AST SpaceMobile Inc0.35%0.12%
First Solar Inc0.34%0.12%
Insmed Inc0.33%0.11%
Burlington Stores Inc0.28%0.10%
TKO Group Holdings Inc0.17%0.06%
CoStar Group Inc0.16%0.06%
Symbotic Inc0.04%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBKOnly in VO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
Natera Inc 1.04%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
Twilio Inc 0.88%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%Datadog Inc 0.84%
FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VBK and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-Cap GrowthMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50010.2%91.4%
Holdings545282

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBK or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBK returned +13.8% and VO returned +12.0%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBK or VO?
VBK charges 0.05% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBK and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of VBK and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBK against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBK against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBK-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources