Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XRT: how they differ

VB and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXRT
Casey's General Stores Inc0.36%1.17%
Best Buy Co Inc0.18%1.36%
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc0.17%1.43%
BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc0.14%1.27%
Burlington Stores Inc0.12%1.31%
Five Below Inc0.12%1.24%
GameStop Corp0.11%1.33%
Murphy USA Inc0.11%1.19%
Maplebear Inc0.10%1.55%
Tractor Supply Co0.10%1.39%
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc0.10%1.32%
CarMax Inc0.09%1.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XRT
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Jabil Inc 0.49%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Coupang Inc 1.55%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%MarineMax Inc 1.52%
Natera Inc 0.45%Dollar Tree Inc 1.48%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Winmark Corp 1.47%
Twilio Inc 0.38%ThredUp Inc 1.46%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%eBay Inc 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+15.2%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%22.5%
Holdings131175

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XRT returned −3.0%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XRT?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources