Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XLY: how they differ

VB and XLY hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLY hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXLY
Tapestry Inc0.36%0.74%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.33%0.68%
Genuine Parts Co0.20%0.40%
Best Buy Co Inc0.18%0.37%
Ralph Lauren Corp0.17%0.39%
Deckers Outdoor Corp0.17%0.35%
Hasbro Inc0.14%0.28%
Domino's Pizza Inc0.12%0.23%
NVR Inc0.11%0.46%
MGM Resorts International0.10%0.23%
Tractor Supply Co0.10%0.41%
Wynn Resorts Ltd0.09%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XLY
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Amazon.com Inc 22.24%
Jabil Inc 0.49%Tesla Inc 19.66%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Home Depot Inc/The 5.83%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%McDonald's Corp 4.16%
Natera Inc 0.45%TJX Cos Inc/The 3.93%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Booking Holdings Inc 3.44%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Starbucks Corp 2.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+15.2%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%100.0%
Holdings131147

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XLY returned −4.1%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XLY?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources