Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VPU: how they differ

VB and VPU hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VPU hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VPU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVPU
NRG Energy Inc0.38%1.79%
Atmos Energy Corp0.35%1.81%
Evergy Inc0.23%1.25%
Talen Energy Corp0.21%0.99%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp0.16%0.79%
NiSource Inc0.14%1.46%
Essential Utilities Inc0.13%0.69%
AES Corp/The0.13%0.69%
OGE Energy Corp0.12%0.64%
Alliant Energy Corp0.12%1.11%
IDACORP Inc0.10%0.50%
Oklo Inc0.09%0.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VPU
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%NextEra Energy Inc 11.84%
Jabil Inc 0.49%Southern Co/The 6.70%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Duke Energy Corp 6.31%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%Constellation Energy Corp 5.86%
Natera Inc 0.45%American Electric Power Co Inc 4.47%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Sempra 3.85%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Dominion Energy Inc 3.78%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%Vistra Corp 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VB and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-CapUtilities
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+2.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%90.1%
Holdings131166

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VPU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VPU returned +2.1%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VPU?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources