Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
USO vs XOP: how they differ
USO and XOP are both commodity funds, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against +52.4%.
United States Oil Fund, LP and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.
| USO United States Oil Fund, LP | XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | United | State Street |
| What it is | Oil | SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Total return, 1 year | +112.2% | +52.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +94.7 pts | +34.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 51 |
USO in plain words
USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.
XOP in plain words
XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, USO or XOP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USO returned +112.2% and XOP returned +52.4%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, USO against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USO-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources