Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs XLY: how they differ

USMV and XLY hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and XLY hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVXLY
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION1.25%4.16%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.1.15%3.93%
YUM! Brands, Inc.0.98%1.10%
AUTOZONE, INC.0.95%1.31%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.83%1.90%
DOORDASH, INC.0.20%1.74%
AMAZON.COM, INC.0.15%22.24%
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.0.08%5.83%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in XLY
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Tesla Inc 19.66%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%Booking Holdings Inc 3.44%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%Starbucks Corp 2.90%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Marriott International Inc/MD 2.02%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc 1.87%
Chubb Limited 1.50%General Motors Co 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+6.6%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%100.0%
Holdings17047

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or XLY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and XLY returned −4.1%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or XLY?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources