Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

URTH vs XLF: how they differ

URTH and XLF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI World ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and XLF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions URTH and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingURTHXLF
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.90%11.57%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.0.72%12.10%
VISA INC.0.60%7.51%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED0.46%5.47%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.39%4.91%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.0.34%3.94%
MORGAN STANLEY0.27%3.31%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY0.27%3.34%
CITIGROUP INC.0.25%3.15%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY0.19%2.38%
BLACKROCK, INC.0.17%1.83%
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION0.16%1.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in URTHOnly in XLF
NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%Chubb Ltd 1.62%
APPLE INC. 5.04%Aon PLC 0.94%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50%Arch Capital Group Ltd 0.45%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%Willis Towers Watson PLC 0.33%
ALPHABET INC. 2.43%Everest Group Ltd 0.19%
BROADCOM INC. 2.21%Globe Life Inc 0.18%
ALPHABET INC. 2.01%Assurant Inc 0.18%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%Invesco Ltd 0.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

URTH and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI WorldFinancials
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.24%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50070.3%100.0%
Holdings132276

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and XLF returned +7.6%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URTH or XLF?
URTH charges 0.24% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

URTH against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources