Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

URTH vs VIG: how they differ

URTH and VIG hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI World ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and VIG hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions URTH and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingURTHVIG
APPLE INC.5.04%4.10%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.50%3.99%
BROADCOM INC.2.21%5.21%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.97%3.36%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.90%3.61%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.67%2.92%
VISA INC.0.60%2.34%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.60%2.51%
WALMART INC.0.56%2.62%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.52%1.64%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.47%2.04%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED0.46%1.86%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in URTHOnly in VIG
NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%Albemarle Corp 0.10%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%BWX Technologies Inc 0.09%
ALPHABET INC. 2.43%Royal Gold Inc 0.09%
ALPHABET INC. 2.01%ITT Inc 0.08%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%DT Midstream Inc 0.07%
TESLA, INC. 1.35%Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc 0.07%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.20%Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc 0.07%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.92%Reinsurance Group of America Inc 0.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

URTH and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI WorldDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.24%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50070.3%95.7%
Holdings1322332

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and VIG returned +12.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URTH or VIG?
URTH charges 0.24% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

URTH against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources