Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VYM: how they differ

SPYG and VYM hold 16% of their weight in the same names.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VYM hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVYM
Broadcom Inc5.04%8.07%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.68%3.36%
Caterpillar Inc1.38%1.73%
Johnson & Johnson1.02%2.31%
RTX Corp0.72%0.99%
Cisco Systems Inc0.69%1.52%
AbbVie Inc0.58%1.57%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The0.55%1.08%
Philip Morris International Inc0.45%1.08%
Morgan Stanley0.43%0.91%
International Business Machines Corp0.39%0.90%
Amgen Inc0.38%0.72%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VYM
NVIDIA Corp 13.66%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Microsoft Corp 7.81%Chevron Corp 1.51%
Apple Inc 5.99%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
Alphabet Inc 5.91%Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.41%
Micron Technology Inc 3.67%Home Depot Inc/The 1.37%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.49%Merck & Co Inc 1.14%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.04%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%92.2%
Holdings147608

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VYM returned +17.6%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VYM?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources