Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VHT: how they differ

SPYG and VHT hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VHT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVHT
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%14.07%
Johnson & Johnson1.02%8.48%
AbbVie Inc0.58%6.10%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.40%2.39%
Amgen Inc0.38%2.87%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.24%2.64%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.17%0.96%
Stryker Corp0.13%1.66%
Boston Scientific Corp0.12%1.14%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.12%0.71%
Edwards Lifesciences Corp0.07%0.80%
Incyte Corp0.05%0.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VHT
NVIDIA Corp 13.66%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
Microsoft Corp 7.81%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Apple Inc 5.99%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
Alphabet Inc 5.91%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
Broadcom Inc 5.04%Pfizer Inc 2.36%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84%
Micron Technology Inc 3.67%Danaher Corp 1.84%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.49%CVS Health Corp 1.83%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPYG and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.09%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%85.6%
Holdings147401

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VHT?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources