Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYD vs VYM: how they differ
SPYD and VYM hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and VYM hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Chevron Corp | 1.20% | 1.51% |
| PepsiCo Inc | 1.11% | 0.91% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 1.30% | 0.85% |
| AT&T Inc | 1.06% | 0.76% |
| Pfizer Inc | 1.12% | 0.64% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 1.27% | 0.52% |
| Altria Group Inc | 1.42% | 0.51% |
| CVS Health Corp | 1.53% | 0.44% |
| Duke Energy Corp | 1.28% | 0.42% |
| Comcast Corp | 1.02% | 0.41% |
| US Bancorp | 1.31% | 0.37% |
| United Parcel Service Inc | 1.19% | 0.33% |
| Only in SPYD | Only in VYM |
|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Inc 1.62% | Broadcom Inc 8.07% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36% |
| Kimco Realty Corp 1.46% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73% |
| Simon Property Group Inc 1.45% | Johnson & Johnson 2.31% |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.45% | Caterpillar Inc 1.73% |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc 1.44% | AbbVie Inc 1.57% |
| Essex Property Trust Inc 1.36% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.52% |
| Regency Centers Corp 1.35% | Bank of America Corp 1.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Vanguard |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 92.2% |
| Holdings | 78 | 608 |
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYD or VYM?
- SPYD charges 0.07% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYD and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYD-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources