Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPY vs XOVR: how they differ

SPY and XOVR hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and SPY returned more over the year.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPY and XOVR hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPY and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYXOVR
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%9.48%
Alphabet, Inc.3.25%6.53%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%4.47%
Tesla, Inc.1.84%1.63%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.0.42%0.56%
Arista Networks, Inc.0.27%2.31%
AppLovin Corp.0.21%3.95%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.0.12%3.56%
DoorDash, Inc.0.11%2.04%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.0.10%1.77%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.0.07%2.60%
ResMed, Inc.0.04%1.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYOnly in XOVR
Apple, Inc. 6.59%Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Microsoft Corp. 4.30%Natera Inc 3.70%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%Reddit Inc 2.78%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%Rocket Lab Corp 2.50%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%Mongodb Inc 2.29%
Eli Lilly & Co. 1.47%Roku Inc 2.16%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.47%Tempus Ai Inc 2.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPY and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetERShares
What it isS&P 500, book from IVVPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+17.5%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.75%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%43.4%
Holdings50432

SPY in plain words

SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPY or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPY returned +17.5% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPY or XOVR?
SPY charges 0.09% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPY and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPY and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPY against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPY against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPY-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources