Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPMO vs XLK: how they differ
SPMO and XLK hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and XLK hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPMO | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.46% | 14.66% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 10.72% | 5.42% |
| Broadcom Inc. | 7.58% | 5.41% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.14% | 5.28% |
| Lam Research Corp. | 3.54% | 3.02% |
| Intel Corp. | 2.95% | 3.68% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.02% | 2.59% |
| Sandisk Corp. | 2.46% | 1.88% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 1.77% | 3.20% |
| KLA Corp. | 1.39% | 2.20% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 1.39% | 1.49% |
| Western Digital Corp. | 1.77% | 1.23% |
| Only in SPMO | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc. 4.81% | Apple Inc 12.86% |
| Johnson & Johnson 3.85% | Microsoft Corp 8.38% |
| Alphabet Inc. 3.81% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.54% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78% | Texas Instruments Inc 1.51% |
| Caterpillar Inc. 2.60% | International Business Machines Corp 1.47% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% | Marvell Technology Inc 1.45% |
| General Electric Co. 1.63% | Oracle Corp 1.39% |
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) 1.43% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 Momentum | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.5% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.0 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 99 | 74 |
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or XLK?
- SPMO charges 0.13% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPMO and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources