Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPMO vs XLG: how they differ

SPMO and XLG hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and XLG hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPMO and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPMOXLG
NVIDIA Corp.8.46%13.10%
Broadcom Inc.7.58%4.85%
Alphabet Inc.4.81%6.05%
Alphabet Inc.3.81%4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.2.78%1.74%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.14%1.56%
Johnson & Johnson3.85%1.50%
Caterpillar Inc.2.60%1.12%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.02%0.98%
Palantir Technologies Inc.1.39%0.86%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)1.21%0.82%
General Electric Co.1.63%0.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPMOOnly in XLG
Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%Apple Inc. 10.76%
Lam Research Corp. 3.54%Microsoft Corp. 8.18%
Intel Corp. 2.95%Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
Sandisk Corp. 2.46%Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%Tesla, Inc. 2.90%
Applied Materials, Inc. 1.77%Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35%
Western Digital Corp. 1.77%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.28%
RTX Corp. 1.40%Eli Lilly and Co. 2.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPMO and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isS&P 500 MomentumS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.20%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings9951

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or XLG?
SPMO charges 0.13% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPMO against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources