Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPMO vs VLUE: how they differ

SPMO and VLUE hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and VLUE hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPMO and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPMOVLUE
Micron Technology, Inc.10.72%11.63%
Intel Corp.2.95%9.29%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.02%4.97%
Applied Materials, Inc.1.77%3.67%
Western Digital Corp.1.77%1.89%
Citigroup Inc.0.97%1.94%
Newmont Corp.1.09%0.64%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.0.42%0.59%
General Motors Co.0.41%3.16%
TE Connectivity PLC0.31%0.93%
Ford Motor Co.0.30%1.50%
State Street Corp.0.17%0.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPMOOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
Broadcom Inc. 7.58%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Alphabet Inc. 4.81%BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.80%
Johnson & Johnson 3.85%FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69%
Alphabet Inc. 3.81%MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57%
Lam Research Corp. 3.54%COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%PFIZER INC. 1.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPMO and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoiShares
What it isS&P 500 MomentumMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.15%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%96.9%
Holdings99148

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or VLUE?
SPMO charges 0.13% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPMO against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources