Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPMO vs VBR: how they differ
SPMO and VBR hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and VBR hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPMO | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.17% | 0.40% |
| Tapestry, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.64% |
| Jabil Inc. | 0.15% | 0.87% |
| C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.45% |
| Atmos Energy Corp. | 0.11% | 0.62% |
| Albemarle Corp. | 0.10% | 0.17% |
| NRG Energy, Inc. | 0.10% | 0.66% |
| Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. | 0.09% | 0.24% |
| Evergy, Inc. | 0.09% | 0.41% |
| NiSource Inc. | 0.08% | 0.24% |
| Bunge Global S.A. | 0.08% | 0.36% |
| Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 0.07% | 0.28% |
| Only in SPMO | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72% | Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59% |
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.46% | Moderna Inc 0.54% |
| Broadcom Inc. 7.58% | Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% |
| Alphabet Inc. 4.81% | F5 Inc 0.50% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14% | US Foods Holding Corp 0.48% |
| Johnson & Johnson 3.85% | JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47% |
| Alphabet Inc. 3.81% | Expand Energy Corp 0.47% |
| Lam Research Corp. 3.54% | Omnicom Group Inc 0.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Vanguard |
| What it is | S&P 500 Momentum | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.5% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.0 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 99 | 840 |
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and VBR returned +16.3%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or VBR?
- SPMO charges 0.13% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPMO and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources