Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPMO vs USMV: how they differ
SPMO and USMV hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and USMV hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPMO | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.02% | 1.81% |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.46% | 1.64% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | 2.78% | 1.60% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 3.85% | 1.44% |
| Amphenol Corp. | 1.30% | 1.51% |
| Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.21% | 1.20% |
| Newmont Corp. | 1.09% | 1.18% |
| Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 0.83% | 0.82% |
| Welltower Inc. | 0.76% | 0.80% |
| Corning Inc. | 0.95% | 0.68% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.14% | 0.53% |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | 1.29% | 0.52% |
| Only in SPMO | Only in USMV |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc. 4.81% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56% |
| Lam Research Corp. 3.54% | DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55% |
| Intel Corp. 2.95% | THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53% |
| Caterpillar Inc. 2.60% | Chubb Limited 1.50% |
| Sandisk Corp. 2.46% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% | WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48% |
| Western Digital Corp. 1.77% | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1.46% |
| General Electric Co. 1.63% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | iShares |
| What it is | S&P 500 Momentum | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.5% | +6.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.0 pts | −10.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 94.8% |
| Holdings | 99 | 170 |
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or USMV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and USMV returned +6.6%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or USMV?
- SPMO charges 0.13% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPMO and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources