Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs XOP: how they differ
SPLG is an equity index fund and XOP a commodity fund, and over the year XOP returned more, +52.4% against +17.6%.
S&P 500, book from IVV and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | S&P | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +52.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | +34.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 51 |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
XOP in plain words
XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or XOP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources