Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPLG vs USFR: how they differ

SPLG is an equity index fund and USFR a bond index fund, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against +4.1%.

S&P 500, book from IVV and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

SPLG and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerS&PWisdomTree
What it isS&P 500, book from IVVFloating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−13.4 pts
Expense rationot published0.15%
Holdingsnot filed4

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or USFR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and USFR returned +4.1%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPLG against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources