Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPHQ vs XLP: how they differ
SPHQ and XLP hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and XLP hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPHQ | XLP |
|---|---|---|
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 4.82% | 9.06% |
| Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 3.46% | 7.46% |
| Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 3.34% | 6.87% |
| Monster Beverage Corp. | 0.82% | 4.47% |
| Mondelez International, Inc. | 0.80% | 4.17% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 0.71% | 4.71% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.40% | 2.37% |
| Kenvue Inc. | 0.32% | 2.39% |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 0.25% | 1.50% |
| Constellation Brands, Inc. | 0.24% | 1.26% |
| Dollar Tree, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.43% |
| Only in SPHQ | Only in XLP |
|---|---|
| Visa Inc. 4.69% | Walmart Inc 10.84% |
| Apple Inc. 4.51% | Philip Morris International Inc 6.16% |
| Mastercard Inc. 4.32% | Altria Group Inc 4.55% |
| General Electric Co. 4.16% | PepsiCo Inc 4.34% |
| Lam Research Corp. 4.10% | Target Corp 3.87% |
| Caterpillar Inc. 3.78% | Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 2.90% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54% | Sysco Corp 2.60% |
| KLA Corp. 3.27% | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 2.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | XLP State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 Quality | Consumer staples |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +6.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 99 | 34 |
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLP in plain words
XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or XLP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and XLP returned +6.3%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPHQ or XLP?
- SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPHQ and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources