Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs XLG: how they differ

SPHQ and XLG hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and XLG hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQXLG
Apple Inc.4.51%10.76%
Visa Inc.4.69%1.50%
Costco Wholesale Corp.4.82%1.22%
Caterpillar Inc.3.78%1.12%
Mastercard Inc.4.32%1.11%
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%0.98%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)3.46%0.92%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)3.34%0.82%
General Electric Co.4.16%0.82%
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%0.73%
Accenture PLC1.04%0.30%
Adobe Inc.1.45%0.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in XLG
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%NVIDIA Corp. 13.10%
KLA Corp. 3.27%Microsoft Corp. 8.18%
GE Vernova Inc. 3.15%Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
Applied Materials, Inc. 2.80%Alphabet Inc. 6.05%
Gilead Sciences, Inc. 2.28%Broadcom Inc. 4.85%
Western Digital Corp. 2.15%Alphabet Inc. 4.82%
QUALCOMM Inc. 2.03%Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61%
TJX Cos., Inc. (The) 1.79%Tesla, Inc. 2.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

SPHQ and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isS&P 500 QualityS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%100.0%
Holdings9951

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or XLG?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources