Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VTV: how they differ

SPHQ and VTV hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VTV hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVTV
Caterpillar Inc.3.78%1.84%
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%1.57%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)3.46%1.28%
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%1.19%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)3.34%1.05%
General Electric Co.4.16%0.73%
QUALCOMM Inc.2.03%0.73%
Eaton Corp. PLC1.65%0.62%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.2.28%0.59%
Progressive Corp. (The)1.41%0.48%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.1.08%0.46%
Trane Technologies PLC1.30%0.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VTV
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Visa Inc. 4.69%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Apple Inc. 4.51%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
KLA Corp. 3.27%Walmart Inc 1.87%
GE Vernova Inc. 3.15%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
Applied Materials, Inc. 2.80%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPHQ and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 QualityUS value
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%98.6%
Holdings99308

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VTV?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources