Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VOE: how they differ

SPHQ and VOE hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VOE hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVOE
Newmont Corp.1.22%0.86%
Johnson Controls International PLC1.05%0.77%
Allstate Corp. (The)0.70%1.06%
Cencora, Inc.0.66%0.91%
eBay Inc.0.66%0.86%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.0.61%0.72%
Corteva, Inc.0.56%0.99%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.0.46%0.48%
Electronic Arts Inc.0.45%0.45%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.0.40%0.63%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.0.34%0.56%
NetApp, Inc.0.32%0.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VOE
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Visa Inc. 4.69%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
Apple Inc. 4.51%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%CRH PLC 1.24%
General Electric Co. 4.16%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%General Motors Co 1.21%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPHQ and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 QualityMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%96.6%
Holdings99170

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VOE returned +20.2%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VOE?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources